
Who Am I to Judge?
judicial craft versus constitutional theory
$48.00
- Paperback
206 pages
- Release Date
23 July 2025
Summary
Who Needs Constitutional Theory? The Case for Judicial Judgment
A leading legal scholar asks a fundamental question: Do we need a theory of constitutional interpretation?
It is a common argument among originalists that however objectionable you may find their theory, at least they have one, whereas their opponents do not have any theory at all. But as Mark Tushnet argues, for most of the Supreme Court’s history, including some of its most exceptional periods…
Book Details
ISBN-13: | 9780300277012 |
---|---|
ISBN-10: | 0300277016 |
Author: | Mark Tushnet |
Publisher: | Yale University Press |
Imprint: | Yale University Press |
Format: | Paperback |
Number of Pages: | 206 |
Release Date: | 23 July 2025 |
Weight: | 218g |
Dimensions: | 216mm x 140mm |
You Can Find This Book In
What They're Saying
Critics Review
“Professor Tushnet has skillfully and straightforwardly called out the myth of originalism and the rabbit hole of judicial philosophies. For lawyer and non-lawyer alike, this book helps set the course to restore the legitimacy of our judiciary.”—Russ Feingold, president, American Constitution Society“Mark Tushnet, one of the nation’s most distinguished constitutional scholars, thinks constitutional theory is overrated. Debating who has the best theory, he explains, is far less important than paying attention to how judges actually judge. Despite its title, this book is a love letter to judgment—reasoned judgment expressed through sound judicial craft.”—Jack Balkin, Yale Law School
About The Author
Mark Tushnet
Mark Tushnet is William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law emeritus at Harvard Law School. He is the author of more than a dozen books, has edited eight others, and has written numerous articles on constitutional law and legal history.
Returns
This item is eligible for free returns within 30 days of delivery. See our returns policy for further details.